HOME



Search this website

Results and data

Results for Austria

Biodegradable municipal waste

The 2016 target of the Landfill Directive to divert BMW away from landfills has already been met in 2001.

Construction and demolition waste

According the National Waste Management Plan 2006, the recycling rate for C&D waste has increased from 15% in 1985 up to more than 70% in 2006.

Waste prevention

The measures of the Austrian Waste Prevention and Recycling Strategy are still under development, so that no information on results are available.

Results for Belgium

Biodegradable municipal waste

Flemish region

The 2016 target of the Landfill Directive to divert BMW away from landfills has already been met.

Year

Total Biode-gradable municipal waste

1995

3.397.080 ton

 

Year

Total Biode-gradable municipal waste going to landfills

2003

584.115 ton

2004

39.576 ton

2005

27.024 ton

2006

7.202 ton

 

Year

Total Biode-gradable other waste (industrial) going to landfills

Paper/
paperboard

Wood

Animal/
vegetal

Urban Sludge

2003

21.249 ton

118 ton

3.601 ton

16.348 ton

1.182 ton

2004

5.950 ton

294 ton

1.332 ton

4.324 ton

0 ton

2005

6.604 ton

165 ton

288 ton

6.134 ton

17 ton

2006

4.828 ton

213 ton

1.783 ton

2.828

n.a.

Construction and demolition waste

BCR achieves a recycling rate of construction and demolition waste of 80%.

 

 

Flanders achieves a high degree of recovery of construction and demolition waste (over 85%, principally material reuse) and hereby the repressing of landfilling.

Table 1illustrates that the use of recyled granules coming from construction and demolition waste increases. These recycled granules replace primary surface quarrying and are used as construction sand, grit and others.

Recyled granules (ton)

2002

2005

2007

 

 

 

 

concrete aggregates

1.826.400

2.324.000

2.761.000

mix granulated rubble

1.484.800

2.023.000

3.203.000

masonry debris granules

 

363.806

529.000

asphalt debris granules

676.000

 

521.000

 

 

 

 

sieve sand

900.000

1.010.000

1.846.000

sieve sand asphalt debris

 

 

31.000

crushing sand concrete

465.600

581.000

690.000

crushing sand mixed debris

280.000

385.000

610.000

 

 

 

 

rest

0

259.000

263.000

 

 

 

 

Total reuse

5.670.000

7.234.000

10.454.042

Table 1: Use of recycled granules coming from construction and demoliton waste

Waste prevention



Flemish region

Industrial waste Flanders

 

KT

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

TOTAL

29.249,0

28.975,6

26.912,9

28.876,9

27.047,6

33.536,5

34.687,1

Temporary storage

289,3

241,5

142,8

263,8

 

 

 

Pre-treatment

9.391,8

10.184,0

10.099,2

11.194,8

8.909,3

17.684,6

16.854,0

Secundary raw material

6.811,5

5.406,8

4.647,5

4.069,5

4.305,4

6.432,2

7.592,5

Recycling

8.575,0

8.778,1

8.086,5

9.231,2

9.527,3

5.844,5

6.291,2

Incineration

1.218,5

1.309,0

1.619,4

1.779,2

1.345,2

1.984,9

1.888,6

Landfilling

2.962,9

3.056,4

2.317,6

2.338,3

2.960,4

1.590,2

2.060,7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-hazardous

28.222,0

27.719,7

25.873,0

27.730,4

24.250,7

30.734,6

31.980,6

Hazardous

1.027,0

1.255,9

1.039,9

1.146,5

2.796,9

2.801,9

2.706,5

Results for Bulgaria

Biodegradable municipal waste

no information

Construction and demolition waste

no information

Waste prevention

no information

Results for Croatia

Biodegradable municipal waste

Generation of municipal waste per capita in Croatia is increasing, and further significant increase is to be expected, due to anticipated development in the economy and tourism, increasing consumption and collection coverage.

Out of the total amount of municipal waste generated, still small amount is separately collected and sent to recovery. Data on the waste flows still confirms the reliance on landfilling of municipal waste.

Separate collection of municipal waste started to develop in Croatia in the second half of the eighties using containers (paper, glass, PET, tin cans) and recycling yards. Adoption of ordinances on specific waste streams (packaging, oils, batteries, ELVs, WEEE etc) already influence the increase of separately collected waste amounts and diversion of it from landfills. However, the system for further decreasing of biodegradable waste deposited on landfills is not fully operational yet.

Construction and demolition waste

The system is not fully operational yet.

Waste prevention

Information about the amount of fee collected or paid within the specific waste streams management schemes are available in the annual reports of the Environmental Protection and Energy Efficiency Fund (www.fzoeu.hr )

Results for Czech Republic

Biodegradable municipal waste

no information

Construction and demolition waste

no information

Waste prevention

no information

Results for Estonia

Biodegradable municipal waste

no information

Construction and demolition waste

no information

Waste prevention

No information.

Results for Finland

Biodegradable municipal waste

no information

Construction and demolition waste

no information

Waste prevention

no information

Results for Germany

Biodegradable municipal waste

The reduction of municipal solid waste going to landfill to nearly zero and the increase of separate collection of biowaste and other waste streams (Paper and cardboard, glass, metals and plastics) for recycling is shown by the figure. MSW which can not be recycled has to be either incinerated or mechanical-biological treated.

development of municipal waste management in Germany

 

 

Construction and demolition waste

Table: Generation and recycling of construction and demolition waste 1999 – 2006 (kt)
year
amount generated
recycled
recycling quota [%]
1999
252,377
220,453
87,4
2000
253,770
222,383
88
2001
243,660
215,271
88
2002
240,812
206,076
86
2003
223,389
192,626
86
2004
188,607
162,893
86
2005
184,919
160,413
87
2006
196,374
173,678
88
source: Statistical Office: Aufkommen und Entsorgung 1999-2006

Waste prevention

The packaging consumption, recycling amount and recycling quotas in Germany are summarized in the following table:
 



 
 
Up to 2005 the Packaging Ordinance prescribed a share of reusable packaging of drinks (exclu­ding milk) of 72% and a share of ecologically advantageous packaging of pasteurised milk of 20%. If the beverage packaging sector failed to meet these quotas, a mandatory deposit on non-reusab­le, non-ecologically advantageous beverage packaging was to be introduced. The reusable quota for drinks rose in 1992 and 1993, but the trend has been downwards since 1994 and in 1997, the reusable quota failed to meet the prescribed 72%. Based on the ordinance, a mandatory deposit on non- reusable drinks containers for certain types of beverages (including beer, carbonated soft drinks and carbonated water) has come into effect in January 2003.
In 2005, the packaging ordinance was amended. The ordinance now aims to increase to at least 80% the share of beverages filled into reusable drinks packaging and ecologically advantageous one-way drinks packaging (drinks carton packaging, drinks packaging in the form of polyethylene bags and stand-up bags). The ecologically advantageous one-way drinks packaging systems are also exempted from the mandatory deposit scheme.
Additionally, the mandatory deposit scheme for one-way beverage packaging now covers a slightly larger part of all beverages, including beer (also non-alcoholic beer and mixed drinks containing beer), carbonated and non-carbonated water soft drinks (e.g. lemonades, cola drinks or ice tea, but exempting fruit juices and fruit nectars), mixed alcoholic drinks (containing less than 15 per cent alcohol or containing less than 50 per cent wine or wine-like products).
Share of reusable packaging of beverages in %
 
1991
1995
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
Total drinks (excl. milk)
71,69
72,27
70,13
65,46
56,20
60,30
50,50
Mineral water
91,33
89,03
87,44
80,96
68,30
67,60*
52,60*
Fruit juice and other still drinks
34,56
38,24
35,66
33,35
29,20
20,60
14,00
Carbonated soft drinks
73,72
75,31
77,02
68,45
54,00
62,20*
47,50*
Beer
82,16
79,07
76,14
73,07
68,00
87,80*
86,90*
Wine
28,63
30,42
26,20
25,76
25,30
20,00
17,50
Source: Society for Packaging Market Research (GVM), Gesellschaft für Verpackungsmarktforschung mbH( GVM): Verbrauch von Getränken in Ein- und Mehrweg-Verpackungen, Berichtsjahr 2006; Umweltforschungsplan des Bundesministeriums für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit; Forschungsbericht 206 32 300; UBA-FB 001127, Texte 15/08; ISSN 1862-4804 (http://www.umweltdaten.de/publikationen/fpdf-l/3458.pdf)
*) introduction of a mandatory deposit system for mineral water, still drinks and beer
 
 
The data concerning the re-use, recycling and recovery of end-of-life vehicles in Germany are shown in the following table:
Table: Reuse & recycling and reuse & recovery quota for end-of-life vehicles in Germany [BMU 2008]
Year
2004
2005
2006
Reuse and Recycling
77,2%
80,2 %
86,8%
Reuse and Recovery
79,7 %
82,9 %
89,5%
In 2007, 41 % of the batteries and accumulators distributed on the German market were collected separately.
 

Results for Ireland

Biodegradable municipal waste

Diversion of biodegradable municipal waste from landfill did not progress well up to 2007 (see the table). However, in 2008, the roll-out of brown bins (for household organic – food and garden – waste) accelerated and this has continued in 2009. In 2009, a regulation requiring the segregation and separation collection of food waste from commercial premises will be introduced. Landfill licences will be reviewed to ensure that the landfills will not accept more biodegradable municipal waste than is allowable under the Landfill Directive’s diversion targets. A monitoring programme for the first target year, 2010, will be developed in 2009 to allow all waste operators to closely track their own and national progress in the landfilling of biodegradable municipal waste.

Targets for Municipal waste diversion from landfill (per directive 1999/31/EC)

(Source: National Waste Report 2007 – this and annual reports back to 2001 at http://www.epa.ie/downloads/pubs/waste/stats/)

Construction and demolition waste

The National Waste Report 2007 illustrates the latest situation regarding the management of construction and demolition waste. C&D waste quantities continued to grow up to 2007. Reporting of waste management data remains poor. The reported recycling of soil and stones decreased in 2007. However, the reported recycling of other C&D waste increased significantly in 2007. The following text is taken from the National Waste Report 2007 - http://www.epa.ie/downloads/pubs/waste/stats/.
 
The total quantity of construction and demolition waste collected in 2007 is estimated at 17,791,745 tonnes, an increase of 5.8% since 2006. During 2007, a reported 12,774,774 tonnes (71.8%) of construction and demolition waste was recovered and 974,934 tonnes (5.4%) was disposed at authorised landfills and at waste permitted facilities.
There continues to be a large discrepancy between the reported collection of construction and demolition waste and its reported disposal and recovery. In 2007, there was a gap of 4,042,037 tonnes. Local authorities have stated that of 3,686 collection permit holders active in their areas, only 2,414 provided an annual environmental report for 2007, a 65% reporting rate. Local authorities estimate that non-reporting collection permit holders collected up to 633,000 tonnes of construction and demolition waste. Of active permitted (recovery) sites, only 770 reported from a total 1,688 active sites, a reporting rate of 45%. Local authorities estimate that non-reporting facility permit holders handled over 1,300,000 tonnes. This still leaves a gap of over 2,000,000 tonnes of waste and this in all likelihood represents a general lack of attention by the construction and demolition industries, and elements of the waste industry serving it, of the need to keep good records and provide reports to local authorities.
Table 19 shows that the reported recovery rate for construction and demolition waste decreased to 71.8% in 2007 (from 79.5% in 2006 and 86.9% in 2005). Construction and demolition waste is comprised largely of soil and stones (approx. 76%) and detailed information on this fraction is presented in Table 20. A total recovery rate of 80.5% of soil and stones is reported, down from 89% in 2006 and 95% in 2005.
Excluding soil and stones, the remainder of construction and demolition waste consists of material such as concrete and rubble, wood, glass, metal and plastic. Table 21 shows that the reported recovery of general construction and demolition waste increased from 1,051,647 tonnes in 2006 to 1,861,441 tonnes in 2007. The reported recovery rate also increased substantially from 36% in 2006 to 44% in 2007.

 

Waste prevention

no information

Results for Italy

Biodegradable municipal waste

In 2006 the total production of MW in Italy reached 32,5 million tonnes.

Recently there has been a gradual increase in separate collection of municipal waste. In 2006, the national percentage is about 25,8%, as shown in the following table.

Area

Percentage of separate collection in different years

2003

2004

2005

2006

North

33,5

35,5

37,9

39,9

Centre

17,1

18,3

19,2

20,0

South

6,7

8,1

8,8

10,2

Italy

21,1

22,7

24,2

25,8

Source: ISPRA

Northern regions reach a percentage near to 40%, achieving one year ahead the target set by law.

The percentages of separate collection reached in central and southern regions are quite lower (20% and 10,2% respectively).

Data on the management of municipal waste shown a gradual reduction in the landfilling of waste, alongside and increase of the other options (e.g composting of biowaste from separate collection, mechanical biological treatment, incineration, etc.).

During the last period, as shown in the following figure, landfilling has decreased from about 60% in  2002 to 49% in 2005.

 

Note: *”other forms of material recovery” includes slags from incineration of municipal waste recovered in cements kilns and some fractions from separate collection which are sent to recovery (minus the discard from selection facilities): packaging waste, textiles and bulky waste.

Source: ISPRA

In 2006 the per capita amount of municipal biowaste (kitchen waste + green waste) sent to composting plants for selected fractions has reached, at national level, 38.2 kg/inhabitant per year.

The situation is quite diversified among the different parts of the country reflecting a strong difference between North and South (see the following table).

Area

per capita amount of municipal biowaste treated in composting plants (year 2006)

(kg/inhab.*year)

North

65.6

Centre

28.7

South

8.1

Italy

38.2

Source: ISPRA

 

http://cdr.eionet.europa.eu/it/eea/wastepolicies/envsbu4tg/italy_diag_2.JPG

Construction and demolition waste

Data on the production of non-hazardous C&D waste is estimated by ISPRA. Data on the production of hazardous C&D waste come from annual declarations of producers (MUD).

The table below shows the total C&D waste production in 2005, while the trend for production of non hazardous C&D waste for the years 2000-2005, is shown in the figure.

More detailed informations are available on Rapporto Rifiuti published by ISPRA

Typology of C&D waste generated in year 2005

Quantity

(1 000* tons)

non hazardous waste*

45 851.5

hazardous waste

803.4

Total

46 654.9

Note: *estimated data

Source: ISPRA

 

Production of non-hazardous C&D waste during the period 2000-2005

 

Note: estimated data

Source: ISPRA

 

Waste prevention

Results of prevention policies in place can not currently be quantified. Indeed, the measures have been implemented fairly recently, which means comprehensive impact assessment are impossible. Certain provisions are yet to be put into practice.

For instance, the introduction of home composting should reduce the total amount of biowaste produced by households. Similarly, a reduction of total municipal waste production is expected following the introduction of the door-to-door collection. All these practices are quite recent and are not equally implemented throughout the entire territory. Furthermore, they typically take place at regional level, co their effectiveness should be evaluated at regional level.

More consistent results should be expected in the coming years, when it will be possible to assess, more effectively, the impact of current prevention measures. However, these evaluations are not easy undertakings, as they require the analysis of each specific context.

Some data related to the implementation of prevention measures provided by the legislation are available for the reuse of packaging. Coherently to EU directives, Decree 152/2006 promotes the production of reusable packaging and their correct use. Some data about reuse of packaging are reported in the following table. These data refer to year 2006.

Material

packaging

Quantity (year 2006)

Packaging used in food and beverage sector

Other uses

(tons)

(tons)

Wood

bottles

209.850

-

boxes

2.900

-

Paper and paperboard

boxes

-

-

drums

-

-

Aluminium

boxes <= 50 l

-

-

drums > 50 l e >= 300 l

-

-

Steel

boxes <= 50 l

17.300

-

drums > 50 l e >= 300 l

-

12.600

Wood

Fruit boxes

423.542

-

Industrial containers

-

701.700

Pallets

-

1.097.885

Plastic

Bags

-

-

Bottles

1.300

-

Pallets

-

11.194

Drums

-

11.500

Boxes

675.673

233.356

Others

-

-

Results for Latvia

Biodegradable municipal waste

Increase of waste composting amounts in special composting facilities.

Construction and demolition waste

no information

Waste prevention

Information not estimated

Results for Netherlands

Biodegradable municipal waste

No information

Construction and demolition waste

No information

Waste prevention

No information

Results for Norway

Biodegradable municipal waste

Please, see 5.4.2.

Construction and demolition waste

SFT, County Governors and municipalities are organising campaigns to control the CD-industry to see whether they follow up the new regulations.

Results for Poland

Construction and demolition waste

Waste from construction and demolition works undergo recovery and disposal processes in installations and by other means, for instance, for levelling the ground, reclamation of post-excavation pits (total about 1.2 million Mg), and also disposal processes (about 0.3 million Mg).

Results for Romania

Biodegradable municipal waste

no information

Construction and demolition waste

No results for C&D waste for the moment.

Waste prevention

The measures are still under development, so no results are available for the moment.

Results for Slovakia

Biodegradable municipal waste

The key fractions of biodegradable municipal waste include:

  1. Kitchen waste
  2. Garden waste
  3. Paper and card
  4. Textiles (of natural origin)
  5. Nappies
  6. Wood

In Slovakia, ‘kitchen waste’ and ‘garden waste’ account for close to 40% of MSW. The biodegradable fraction of MSW (also including textiles and nappies, paper and paperboard) is around 65% -70%.

Construction and demolition waste

No information

Waste prevention

no information

Results for Slovenia

Biodegradable municipal waste

The system is not fully operated yet. No results.

Construction and demolition waste

Recovery rate for C&D waste has increased.

The quantity of collected waste material content asbestos has risen.

More information could be found in indicator for C&D waste: http://kazalci.arso.gov.si/kazalci/index_htmlωlang=1&Kaz_id=108&Kaz_naziv=Gradbeni%20odpadki&Sku_id=5&Sku_naziv=ODPADKI%20IN%20SNOVNI%20TOK&tip_kaz=1#KAZALEC_TOP

Waste prevention

The results of policy instruments are not available

Results for Sweden

Biodegradable municipal waste

no information

Construction and demolition waste

no information

Waste prevention

For the past decades Swedish waste management has focused on improving the treatment technologies and on reducing the amount of waste going to landfill. These are both positive developments from an environmental perspective.  Although the treatment of the waste has improved, the quantity of municipal solid waste grows, in average by approximately 2% per year.

 The quantities of industrial waste are much larger, but it is difficult to investigate how they change over time.

 The total quantity of Swedish waste is uncertain and depends on the method for defining and recording the waste. The quantity of municipal solid waste  grows steadily, however.

Results for Switzerland

Biodegradable municipal waste

no information

Construction and demolition waste

The overall results of the waste policy of the last 20 years are broadly positive. Swiss waste management can today be described as a well-oiled global system, from which the environmental emissions are only a fraction of what they were in the middle of the 1980s, with a recycling rate of 50% for municipal waste. The building of environmentally sound treatment capacities combined with the implementation of the polluter-pays principle lead quite surely to a less important increase of the amounts of waste.

Waste prevention

no information

Results for Turkey

Biodegradable municipal waste

No result available

Construction and demolition waste

No available results and data

Waste prevention

According to the indicators of EUROSTAT on Turkey,

Municipal Waste (1996-2007) kg per person a year in Turkey was:

Years

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

Amount

471

503

510

463

458

457

450

445

421

438

415

430

Municipal Waste Landfilled (kg per capita)

Years

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

Amount

345

362

371

354

357

360

357

363

345

362

341

359

Municipal Waste Incinerated (kg per capita)

Years

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

Amount

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

ÇEVKO has undertaken the recycling responsibility of 780 businesses and managed to recycled 413,500 tons of paper/carton, plastic, metal, glass and compost materials. ÇEVKO also works in cooperation with 104 municipalities; and it has been reported that within the scope of this cooperation, around 5,180,000 people from 1,473,407 households and work places, manage to collect their waste separately and dispatch them to recycling facilities.

Table 5 Municipalities in which Implementations of Separate Collection at Source is Carried Out

Region

Number of Dwellings and Business reached

Population reached (person)

Adana -Seyhan

34.000 Dwellings

135.000

Adapazarı- Akyazı

3.294 Dwellings  and  business

10.738

Adapazarı- Merkez

14.952 Dwellings  and  Business

58.000

Ankara- Beypazarı

4.531 Dwellings  and  Business

15.000

Ankara- Kazan

4.581 Dwellings

15.000

Ankara- Mamak

13.080 Dwellings

60.000

Ankara- Yenimahalle

92.080 Dwellings

280.000

Ankara- Çankaya

75.164 Dwellings  and  Public Institution

250.000

Antalya- Konyaaltı

27.396 Dwellings  and  Hotels

110.000

Antalya- Muratpaşa

70.000 Dwellings  and  Hotels

250.000

Aydın- Didim

25.158 Dwellings , 352 Business

101.480

Aydın- Merkez

1.014 Dwellings

4.000

Balıkesir

54.968 Dwellings

196.000

Bolu

20.000 Dwellings

60.000

Bursa- Yıldırım

133.219 Dwellings  and  Business

480.000

Bursa- Gürsu

13.301 Dwellings  and  Business

50.039

Bursa- Güzelyalı

10.000 Dwellings  and  Business

40.000

Bursa- Kestel

13.429 Dwellings  and  Business

32.525

Bursa- Mudanya

25.000 Dwellings  and  Business

100.000

Bursa- Nilüfer

44.553 Dwellings  and  Business

178.682

Bursa– Osmangazi

205.540 Dwellings , 2 Shopping Mall

800.000

Eskişehir- Odunpazarı

61.600 Dwellings  and   Business

250.000

Eskişehir-Tepebaşı

24.895 Dwellings

80.000

Gaziantep- Oğuzeli

2.631 Dwellings

7.500

İstanbul- Avcılar

3.000 Dwellings

7.350

İstanbul- Bakırköy

20.357 Dwellings  and  Business

43.274

İstanbul- Gürpınar

12.000 Dwellings  and  Business

40.000

İstanbul- Kadıköy

26.700 Dwellings  and  Business

86.500

İstanbul- Kıraç

3.000 Dwellings  and  Business

10.000

İstanbul- Pendik

54.270 Dwellings  and  Business

130.460

İstanbul- Zeytinburnu

5.000 Dwellings  and  Business

20.000

İzmir- Konak, Karşıyaka, Bornova, Narlıdere, Balçova, Gaziemir, Çiğli, Buca, Aliağa, Özdere, Eski Foça, Ürkmez, Gümüldür, Seferihisar, Urla

162.897 Dwellings , 42 Business , 45 Schools, 45 Health Institute, 44 Otels

651.588

Kocaeli - Bekirpaşa

19.634 Dwellings 

50.000

Konya- Selçuklu

40.000 Dwellings  and  Business

140.000

Manisa

36.000 Dwellings

150.000

Tekirdağ- Çorlu

79.430 Dwellings  and  Business

180.000

Uşak

15.149 Dwellings

60.596

Yalova

21.054 Dwellings

50.000

Toplam

1.473.407 Dwellings  and Business

5.183.732